Skip to main content

Interview with "Abacus: Small Enough to Jail" Director Steve James

When documentary filmmaker Steve James hits the red carpet at tomorrow night's 90th Academy Awards, it will, in my eyes at least, have been a long overdue moment. James was previously nominated for Best Editing for his 1994 masterpiece Hoop Dreams but that great documentary was inexplicably not nominated for Best Documentary Feature. Now James returns to the Oscar race with the Kartemquin Films production Abacus: Small Enough To Jail, a dark horse contender in the doc feature category. Abacus tells the story of the Sung family, owners of the Abacus Federal Savings of Chinatown, New York, who were wrongfully accused of mortgage fraud by the Manhattan District Attorney, as part of the fallout from the 2008 financial crisis.

James sat down with Free Cinema Now to talk about his new film and being recognized by the Academy.

Free Cinema Now: How did this project come to you?

Steve James: It came to my attention through Mark Mitten, one of the producers, who has known the family for over a decade. He learned about what they were going through and that a trail was imminent. [Mitten] decided that this seemed like such a crazy case and it didn't appear that anyone was really following it in the mainstream media at all, so he contacted me and gave me the broad strokes of it. It sounded crazy [to me too]. So we went to New York to shoot, and I was going to decide based on that [footage] whether to continue or not. By day two, I was like, "Okay. We're doing this."

FCN: Early in the film you reference the visual of the Abacus employees, chained together by handcuffs, being led down a hallway after arrest. A talking ahead later makes the comment that never would've happened with a "black group of employees." It's even more shocking to learn that three of those Abacus employees were already indicted and they were still posed to be shackled for the press photo op. Steve, your profession is in convincing the public with the images you present; your film tells a story very much in the same vein: Using images to sway public opinion. Can you share your thoughts on this?

SJ: Yeah, that was archival footage that we got. We managed to use both stuff from news stories and raw footage of the walk down the hallway -- which was really good to get -- so that we could mix the two together. And then [we] combined that with interviews to provide this other perspective on what you're actually watching, because if you just looked at the people being led down the hallway in chains, you don't have a whole lot of context for that; you could think these are some really bad people.

It's interesting that in The New York Times -- which did exactly two articles on this case, that indictment and then the jury's decision three years later -- there's nothing [in their] article about the indictment that says anything, [or is] editorializing, [on] the spectacle of these people being chained together or that they're low level bank employees. It obviously worked for [District Attorney Cyrus] Vance; his intentions were to paint these people as "bad people" and somehow worthy of being shackled together and led down the hallway. It got the attention he wanted to. By giving you the raw footage, without reporters prattling over it, is towards building a different kind of look than what was intended by the people who orchestrated [that spectacle].

FCN: (Nodding) So you broke down [the initial imagery] and then put it back together again. When I was first watching it, I was like, "Whoa"; that footage of them in shackles didn't sit well with me. Then we see the clip again later, but with commentary, and then we see it again, but with different context. 

SJ: And then there's another part -- after Polly Greenberg lies, literally, and says that it wasn't their decision to shackle them together, that it was the court officer's decision -- where we show you a piece [of the footage] again and have Chanterelle [Sung] tell you that that's not true, that they were being led down the hallway by D.A. detectives and we freeze [the frame] on them so you can see it.

All of that is just to show what Vance was trying to run away from it in his interview, [when he was] saying it was "unfortunate," you know, "feelings were hurt" or whatever; we decided to make a pretty big meal of that section because we felt there was a lot of complexity to what was going on there that you would miss otherwise.

FCN: I was thinking about Blowup. I was reminded of him coming back to the image...I look at that whole section [in Abacus] like its own little mini-movie! You think it's "this" but then...shit, it's "that." 

SJ: (Laughs) I'll take the Blowup reference. That's pretty great.

FCN: It's hard to make courtroom drama memorable today in movies. We've almost seen it all, let alone in documentaries. Your film has a striking approach to the images in court -- like the volume levels used for captioning Ken Yu's phone conversations. There were also several shots of empty seats in the court while the soundtrack played the audio of the defendants, plaintiffs and witnesses. How did you and your cinematographer arrive at this visual strategy?

SJ: We knew early on that the court case was going to be an engine for the film [in addition to] how the Sungs were dealing with it. But we didn't know what scenes, out of this 7,000-page transcript from the five-month trial, that we were going to isolate and feature until we got into editing. So, during the trial we hired Christine Cornell, this incredible New York City courtroom artist, to go in and spend a few days and make these drawings. They became a foundation for what we showed in the film, once we started editing those sequences together.

The courtroom sequences are made up of various elements. With the graphics team we came up with this visual representation to show those kinds of [audio] recordings. Then we also used the "empty courtroom [look]." When we went that day to shoot [in the empty courtroom] I had generated a whole list of the kinds of shots that I was looking for, plus [cinematographer] Tom Bergmann is a really great shooter, so it was a very collaborative day in terms of ideas I walked in with and then ideas you think of in the moment. I just didn't want the courtroom parts of the film to feel like "Oh, we're back in the courtroom..." (I knew the family was going to be really engaging outside the courtroom in what they were going through.) But all that courtroom stuff was a challenge in every regard.

FCN: I know you were recognized by The Academy for your editing but you should've been nominated for Best Documentary for Hoop Dreams over twenty years ago. How does this nomination in the Best Documentary category resonate with you?

SJ: When we got the nomination, it was great! It was great for a lot of reasons. One of them is -- this is a small film. It's not as ambitious an undertaking as some of the other films that I've done, including Hoop Dreams. [Plus] the fact that members of the branch took a film like this, and really saw what I think we managed to accomplish as filmmakers, was meaningful. But of course, even more meaningful, was that people really fell in love with this family [the Sungs] and were both moved and humored and then infuriated at the D.A.'s office on their behalf. All those things made it satisfying but I also that back on the other works [that I've done]; I thought back on Hoop Dreams, The Interrupters -- and not like "Oh they should've been nominated!" but [in the sense that] I've been really fortunate to follow the lives of some pretty extraordinary people in my view. To be let into their lives. And to be let into their lives at critical junctures.

So I thought about all those folks when I managed to sit back and reflect on [this Oscar nomination].

----

Watch the trailer for Abacus: Small Enough To Jail below.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

VIDEO ESSAY: Film Fidelity: Beyoncé's "Lemonade"

Beyoncé knocked the wind out of the Internet when she dropped her nearly hour-long visual album Lemonade on HBO this past Saturday night, April 23rd. The inspired film is a remarkable piece to be sure--even for the Queen Bee herself. And while everything from the sound design to the collective creative direction from the team of filmmakers, editors and art department is exceptional, much of the receptive chatter online has instead circled around the implied infidelity that spurs the narrative of Lemonade; the idea that hubby Jay Z did Beyoncé wrong with a certain "Becky with the good hair." Which is too bad; that's the kind of fodder for tabloids and it marginalizes how much great film art is packed into this thing.
So, as a reactionary cinephile, I thought I'd redirect the public's attention to the striking images that Lemonade presents, the ideas behind them and, more pointedly, where these vignettes drew inspiration from. In contrast to the possible off-screen…

VIDEO ESSAY: Paul Thomas Anderson's "The Master"

"He's making all this up as he goes along."

NOTE: I was fortunate enough to attend a rare 70mm screening of Paul Thomas Anderson's The Master on Thursday August 16, 2012 at the Music Box Theatre in Chicago, Illinois. In attendance were writer/director Paul Thomas Anderson and one of the film's actors, Kevin J. O'Connor (both of whom are pictured with mehere).


--

The key to the success of Paul Thomas Anderson's The Master doesn't come in its mammoth achievement of being shot on 70mm film or its carefully constructed parallel origin story of L. Ron Hubbard's Scientology practices. Rather, that success is embedded in an intimate scene: a single shot close-up on alcoholic war veteran Freddie Sutton (an unforgettable Joaquin Phoenix) during a "process of time" session with Lancaster Dodd (Philip Seymour Hoffman in prime Hubbard form). Up until this scene, the character of Freddie dutifully performed the task of delivering the film's dark lau…

The 30 Best Films of 2013

Anyone who tells you that 2013 wasn't a spectacular year for movies is either lying through their teeth or is someone who spent most of the year cooped up in their apartment watching episodic television on Netflix. Here go the 30 best films of the year.


30. Fruitvale Station - Directed by Ryan Coogler
29. Post Tenebras Lux - Directed by Carlos Reygadas
28. Side Effects - Directed by Steven Soderbergh
27. Room 237 - Directed by Rodney Ascher
26. Before Midnight - Directed by Richard Linklater
25. Lenny Cooke - Directed by Joshua and Ben Safdie
24. The Place Beyond The Pines - Directed by Derek Cianfrance
23. Blue Jasmine - Directed by Woody Allen
22. Nebraska - Directed by Alexander Payne
21. Mud - Directed by Jeff Nichols
20. Gravity - Directed Alfonso Cuarón
19. The End of Love - Directed by Mark Webber
18. American Hustle - Directed by David O. Russell
17. Inside Llewyn Davis - Directed by Joel and Ethan Coen
16. Her - Directed by Spike Jonze
15. 12 Years A Slave - Directed by

Far From Heaven: Studying The Headroom In Pawel Pawlikowski's "Ida"

Pawel Pawlikowski's Ida tells the quietly haunting story of a young nun named Anna (Agata Trzebuchowska) who sets out to find her family origins in 1960s Poland. At the beginning of the film, the once-orphaned Anna learns that she still has one living relative: her aunt Wanda Gruz (Agata Kulesza), a revered court judge in the city. As Anna sets out on her journey of self-discovery, Pawlikowski, and cinematographers Ryszard Lenczewski and Lukasz Zal, announce their visual strategy for conveying their protagonist's hopeless and essentially powerless role in the world: by dwarfing the screen figure of Anna with a maximum amount of screen headroom.

Look at how the following shot makes Anna look insignificant against the towering institution of the convent.


In the city, Anna meets her aunt Wanda and there Anna learns that her real name is Ida Lebenstein. After Wanda tells Ida of her parents' horrific death during WWII, the pair set off to find out what exactly happened and perh…

The 25 Best Films of 2014

Under The Skin - Directed by Jonathan GlazerWhiplash - Directed by Damien ChazelleSelma - Directed by Ava DuVernayJoe - Directed by David Gordon GreenA Most Violent Year - Directed by J.C. ChandorThe Immigrant - Directed by James GrayGoodbye To Language - Directed by Jean-Luc GodardInterstellar - Directed by Christopher NolanInherent Vice - Directed by Paul Thomas AndersonNightcrawler - Directed by Dan GilroyBirdman - Directed by Alejandro González IñárrituFoxcatcher - Directed by Bennett MillerGone Girl - Directed by David FincherLife Itself - Directed by Steve JamesDawn of the Planet of the Apes - Directed by Matt ReevesBoyhood - Directed by Richard LinklaterSnowpiercer - Directed by Bong Joon-hoIda - Directed by Peter PawlikowsiAmerican Sniper - Directed by Clint Eastwood

The Motion Picture Superimposed

Julien Donkey-Boy (1999) 
In its earliest days, the superimposed image was used mainly as a special effect, most notably in Victor Sjöström's 1921 film The Phantom Carriage, where it created the illusion of ghosts in the afterlife. These days, the superimposed image is almost everywhere, from an editing dissolve that suggests a continuation in mood (e.g. the transition from a saddened Don Corleone in bed to his home country of Italy where his son Michael has sought refuge in The Godfather) to a literal visualization of a character's inner psychology (e.g. the face of death on Norman Bates in Psycho). For me, I find the superimposed image to be one of the most powerful visual strategies for conveying an idea or a feeling. In fact, last year I created a video essay on the works of Wong Kar-Wai that heavily relied on the use of superimposition to demonstrate the filmmaker's trademark visual fervor. Below, I've curated some standout superimposed images from over the years,…

VIDEO ESSAY: Behind You

That moment when it feels like someone--or something--is standing behind you. But then you turn around and find nothing.


For the cinematic narrative, the point of view (POV) shot is a high-powered filmmaking aesthetic that thrusts the viewer from omniscient viewer to dynamic player within the context of the screen. Whether it's a subjective POV (where the camera/our field-of-view takes the place of the screen figure's own line-of-sight) or an objective POV (where the camera/our field-of-view exists alongside the screen figure, a la "cheek-to-cheek"), the POV shot invades the frame's axis, breaking the 180-degree rule, taking the visual rhetoric of the film to the next level. And as technology and filmmaking tools (e.g. the advent of 3D) continue to push the boundaries of audience-to-screen immersion, one thing remains constant: the audience sure enjoys their God's eye view in the universe of the movie.


Which is why the follow shot (sometimes called the "…

VIDEO: Honorable Mentions and the 20 #BestFilmsOf2015

[Scroll to the bottom for the video]

Honorable Mentions (in no particular order): Jurassic World, Star Wars: Episode VII - The Force Awakens, The Night Before, Tangerine, Amy, The End of the Tour, The Martian, Bridge of Spies, The Wolfpack, The Visit, Mission: Impossible - Rogue Nation, Trainwreck, Avengers: Age of Ultron, Time Out of Mind, Danny Collins, El Club, Inside Out, Phoenix, Crimson Peak, Beasts of No Nation, By The Sea, It Follows, Youth, The Walk, The Hateful Eight, The, Nightmare, Ex Machina, Me and Earl and the Dying Girl, Creep, The Overnight and While We’re Young.
Best Actor: Tom Hardy, Legend Best Actress: Brie Larson, Room Best Supporting Actor: Benicio Del Toro, Sicario Best Supporting Actress: Charlize Theron, Mad Max: Fury Road Best Cinematography: Roger Deakins, Sicario Best Original Screenplay: Damián Szifrón, Wild Tales
Best Adapted Screenplay: Kevin Willmott and Spike Lee, Chi-Raq Best Film Editing: Hank Corwin, The Big Short Best Original Score: Jóhann Jóhannsson, Sic…

THE MARTIAN Snapchat

In an interview discussing his freewheeling and challenging film Goodbye to Language, Jean-Luc Godard made some comments on our current dependency to smartphones and, more specifically, text messaging. He questioned if anyone actually knew what the "SMS" in the phrase 'SMS text messaging' actually stood for. Godard insisted it meant "Save My Soul."
It's that very idea, that notion of being alone in the universe, that drives the dramatic weight of Ridley Scott's latest film The Martian. Much of the film involves the protagonist Mark Watney (Matt Damon) sending video selfies to NASA--and in parallel fashion to the audience in the movie auditorium. While watching the film (which is fairly conventional in regards to its plot) I was provoked by its accidental (or maybe intentional) role as a "selfie space opera."
Stimulated by this idea, I went ahead and created this video that re-imagines the film (which runs around two and a half hours) as a…

The Notion Of Independent Group Distribution--Can It Work?

Independent writer and director Ben Hicks forwarded me his recently published mammoth of an article titled "The Evolution of Film Independence" and his call for a new industry of indie distribution is both compelling--and capable of happening.
"So what is Independent (group) Distribution?
Independent (group) Distribution is when a team of independent filmmakers unite under one Film Collective, in order to effectively distribute their collective works. A Film Collective is nothing more than a trademarked name and logo that the Film Collective’s members share. No one is the owner of the Film Collective and the Film Collective does not own any of the films, the filmmakers do. Each filmmaker is only responsible for their films and are not involved creatively or financially with any other filmmaker’s work. Each Film Collective member must have their own production company from which each individual filmmaker’s films are produced through and which any and all money ea…